Daily Note: 2025-11-11
Except, the Big Bang is not THE Beginning
Never was, never can be
What crisis in cosomology? Don’t be so hystrionic.
Move along, nothing to see here.
Just 2 BILLION Compromise Accounts
TWO … BILLION
Equivalent to 25% of the Population of Earth
This is Fine. 🔥
How to Measure Intelligence
By Qubits, Quarks, Quality, Quantity, Qualia?
(Play ⊆ Learning) ∧ (Learning ⊆ Work) ⊢ (Play ⊆ WORK)
∴ Fiduciary Duty to Shareholder Primacy is FRAUD
“I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of Moloch’s voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.”
-
Micro GAME SOLVED.
-
Macro GAME SOLVED
-
Meta GAME SOLVED.
Just Plain Wrong, Kevin Kelley-remixed Intuition # 1,338:
“Success is Death. Success means the game is over, and it’s not fun anymore” (11:42).
Closer To Truth: “The facts were wrong, the idea was right.” (16:05)
Ready, Player Two?
Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Ƞ …
- Francois Chollet: https://fchollet.com/
- Laura Schulz: https://eccl.mit.edu/laura-schulz-bio
- Junyi Chu: https://jchu10.github.io/
- Jacob Andreas: https://www.mit.edu/~jda/
- Josh Tenebaum: https://web.mit.edu/cocosci/josh.html
- Sam Gershman: https://gershmanlab.com/people/sam.html
Because Immutability is Axiomatic, Dogmatic, Obstinate, Hardline, Inflexible, Rigidified, Doctrinaire, Adamant, Uncompromising, Unyielding, Implacable, and Mercilessly Unaccommodating, etc.
And Must Be So
By Definition
So that things just work.
Beyond String Theory and Loop Gravity:
A New Path Emerging
TRUTH or GTFO
Forever
That’s it. That’s the post.1
FBI Seeks To Unmask Anonymous Archive.Today Web Archiving Service Owner
Authored by José Niño via Headline USA,
The FBI has issued a subpoena to Canadian domain registrar Tucows seeking to unmask the anonymous owner of Archive.today, a popular web archiving service used by millions worldwide.
Source
$ 5 Trillion for AI
Universal Social Security? Impossible.
ECONOMIES, like PHYSICS, are STORIES, MOVIE SCRIPTS.
Nothing more, nothing less.
Why would so-called rational beings continue re-runs of the DUMBEST MOVIES POSSIBLE which have led to the current pandemics of addiction and suicide, fed by engineered disenfranchisement, disillusionment, depression, and de-humanization? Why? If it’s “just stupidity,” then there is a level of stupidity indistinguishable from pure evil, and evil is not entitled to any of the gifts of grace freely available to every human being.
The furious push by AI hyperscalers to build out data centers will need about $1.5 trillion of investment-grade bonds over the next five years and extensive funding from every other corner of the market, according to an analysis by JPMorgan. From a report: “The question is not ‘which market will finance the AI-boom?’ Rather, the question is ‘how will financings be structured to access every capital market?’” according to strategists led by Tarek Hamid. Leveraged finance is primed to provide around $150 billion over the next half decade, they said. Even with funding from the investment-grade and high-yield bond markets, as well as up to $40 billion per year in data-center securitizations, it will still be insufficient to meet demand, the strategists added. Private credit and governments could help cover a remaining $1.4 trillion funding gap, the report estimates. The bank calculates an at least $5 trillion tab that could climb as high as $7 trillion, singlehandedly driving a reacceleration in growth in the bond and syndicated loan markets, the strategists wrote in a report Monday. The analysts project $300 billion in high-grade bonds going toward AI data centers next year. That could account for nearly one fifth of total issuance in that market, which a report from Barclays estimates will grow to $1.6 trillion.
Source
AI Slop on Chrononutrition
How Much Longer Do You Call it SLOP Because You Fear and Hate LEARNING, Poo-Flinging Chimpanzees?
- Insulin sensitivity in healthy people tends to be higher in the morning and declines as the day progresses, aligning broadly with the chart’s depiction of a peak window starting shortly after waking.
- Evidence supports potential metabolic benefits from eating earlier in the day, such as improved glucose control and insulin response, which could make the suggested OMAD windows effective for some.
- However, conflicting research shows advantages to later-day eating, like enhanced fat oxidation and better digestion during parasympathetic dominance in the evening, suggesting the chart’s early windows may not be optimal for everyone.
- Individual variations, including chronotype, sleep patterns, and health status (e.g., type 2 diabetes), influence the best meal timing, so the chart provides a reasonable guideline but isn’t universally prescriptive.
- Always consult a healthcare professional before adopting OMAD, as it can pose risks like nutrient deficiencies or disordered eating.
Understanding Insulin Sensitivity and Circadian Rhythms
Insulin sensitivity refers to how effectively cells respond to insulin to regulate blood sugar. It follows a diurnal pattern influenced by the body’s internal clock. Studies show that in healthy individuals, sensitivity is typically higher in the morning, decreasing toward evening, which can lead to poorer glucose tolerance later in the day. For instance, glucose responses to meals are often more favorable earlier, with research linking earlier calorie intake to better insulin sensitivity regardless of total energy consumed. This pattern is tied to circadian hormones like cortisol, which peaks upon waking and can impact gut function and metabolism.
The chart’s model—peaking 1–2 hours after wake-up and lasting 4–5 hours—approximates this for varying sleep schedules. If wake times shift (e.g., early risers at 4 a.m.), the internal clock may adjust, making the relative timing plausible. However, many studies assume standard wake times around 6–8 a.m., with peaks around noon, so absolute clock time plays a role too.
OMAD and Meal Timing Considerations
OMAD, a form of time-restricted eating, involves consuming all daily calories in one 1–2 hour window. The chart recommends this early in the sensitivity peak (e.g., 9–11 a.m. for a 7 a.m. wake-up), aiming to capitalize on optimal glucose handling. Supporting evidence includes chrononutrition principles, where front-loading calories improves metabolic health, reduces blood sugar elevations, and aligns with active metabolism phases. For example, high-calorie breakfasts have been linked to better fasting glucose and reduced postprandial spikes compared to evening-heavy eating.
Conversely, some research favors evening OMAD (e.g., 5–7 p.m.), showing reductions in body weight and fat mass, increased fat oxidation during exercise, and no detriment to performance. This may stem from parasympathetic nervous system activation later in the day, aiding digestion when cortisol is lower. Morning eating, per some views, could hinder absorption due to stress hormones.
Broader Metabolic Health Implications
Intermittent fasting like OMAD can enhance metabolic flexibility, but timing matters. Early time-restricted eating often yields cardiometabolic benefits, such as lower insulin resistance risk, while late eating is associated with higher HbA1c in diabetics. Yet, for type 2 diabetes, patterns differ—sensitivity may increase at night, potentially making evening meals more tolerable. Overall, aligning meals with personal circadian rhythms (e.g., earlier for morning chronotypes) is key, and skipping breakfast or late dinners can worsen outcomes.
| Wake-Up Time | Chart’s Peak Start | Chart’s Peak End | Chart’s OMAD Window | Potential Pros of This Timing | Potential Cons |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4:00 a.m. | 5:00–6:00 a.m. | 9:00–10:00 a.m. | 6:00–8:00 a.m. | Aligns with early metabolic activity; may improve glucose control | High morning cortisol could impair digestion; less socially convenient |
| 5:00 a.m. | 6:00–7:00 a.m. | 10:00–11:00 a.m. | 7:00–9:00 a.m. | Leverages sensitivity peak for better insulin response | May conflict with work/school schedules |
| 6:00 a.m. | 7:00–8:00 a.m. | 11:00 a.m.–12:00 p.m. | 8:00–10:00 a.m. | Supports front-loaded calories for metabolic health | Potential for energy dips later without snacks |
| 7:00 a.m. | 8:00–9:00 a.m. | 12:00–1:00 p.m. | 9:00–11:00 a.m. | Matches typical noon-ish peak in studies | Evening hunger could lead to overeating if not managed |
| 8:00 a.m. | 9:00–10:00 a.m. | 1:00–2:00 p.m. | 10:00 a.m.–12:00 p.m. | Flexible for late risers; still within active day phase | Reduced window for social meals |
| 9:00 a.m. | 10:00–11:00 a.m. | 2:00–3:00 p.m. | 11:00 a.m.–1:00 p.m. | Accommodates varied lifestyles; potential for lunch-like meal | Later peak may miss optimal morning sensitivity in fixed-clock studies |
Insulin sensitivity, the body’s ability to respond effectively to insulin for blood glucose regulation, exhibits a pronounced circadian rhythm that influences metabolic processes throughout the day. In healthy individuals, this sensitivity is generally elevated in the morning hours following awakening and progressively diminishes as the day advances into the evening and night. This pattern is modulated by the endogenous circadian system, which orchestrates hormonal fluctuations such as cortisol release—peaking shortly after waking to promote alertness but potentially interfering with digestive efficiency—and melatonin, which rises in the evening to facilitate rest. Research utilizing controlled biopsy studies on human subcutaneous adipose tissue has demonstrated that insulin sensitivity reaches its acrophase, or peak, around midday (approximately 11:00 a.m. to noon clock time), where it can be up to 54% higher than at midnight. This diurnal variation is intrinsic to the tissue itself, as evidenced by rhythmic gene expression independent of external cues like feeding, though it is notably absent in visceral adipose tissue. The amplitude of this rhythm correlates positively with sleep duration and negatively with later bedtimes, underscoring the interplay between sleep hygiene and metabolic health.
However, the precise timing of this peak is not rigidly fixed to absolute clock time but can shift in response to individual behavioral cycles, such as habitual wake-up times. For instance, in populations with variable sleep schedules, like shift workers, the circadian clock entrains to light exposure and activity patterns, potentially relocating the sensitivity window relative to personal “morning.” This relativity supports frameworks like the provided chart, which posits a peak commencing 1–2 hours post-wake-up and spanning 4–5 hours, adapting to wake times from 4 a.m. to 9 a.m. Such a model aligns with observations that hepatic insulin sensitivity rises in anticipation of morning meals, preparing the body for nutrient influx. Yet, discrepancies arise in pathological states; individuals with type 2 diabetes often display an inverted pattern, with sensitivity increasing toward the night, leading to exaggerated morning glucose excursions compared to evenings. This highlights the need for personalized approaches, as misalignment between meal timing and internal clocks—termed circadian desynchrony—can exacerbate insulin resistance and glucose intolerance.
Chrononutrition, the study of how meal timing interacts with circadian biology, further informs the debate on optimal eating windows for intermittent fasting regimens like One Meal A Day (OMAD). OMAD restricts intake to a single 1–2 hour period daily, aiming to extend fasting phases for benefits such as enhanced autophagy, reduced inflammation, and improved metabolic flexibility. The chart advocates positioning this window early within the proposed sensitivity peak—for example, 6:00–8:00 a.m. for a 4:00 a.m. wake-up or 11:00 a.m.–1:00 p.m. for a 9:00 a.m. wake-up—hypothesizing that consuming calories during heightened insulin efficiency optimizes glucose disposal and minimizes postprandial spikes. Substantial evidence bolsters this early-eating paradigm: clinical trials indicate that concentrating energy intake earlier (e.g., high-calorie breakfasts) enhances insulin sensitivity, lowers fasting glucose, and attenuates hyperglycemia compared to evening-dominant patterns. A systematic review of meal timing strategies associates earlier caloric distribution with favorable anthropometric and metabolic outcomes, including reduced body weight and improved cardiometabolic markers. Moreover, avoiding late meals (post-8:00 p.m.) mitigates nocturnal glucose intolerance, as evening consumption elicits higher insulin and glucose responses due to diminished sensitivity. Recommendations from chrononutrition emphasize front-loading carbohydrates in the morning for lower glycemic impact, leveraging the “second-meal effect” by sequencing meals (e.g., proteins and fats before carbs) to further stabilize blood sugar.
Counterarguments, however, reveal nuances that challenge the chart’s early bias. Some investigations, including a randomized crossover trial, demonstrate that evening OMAD (e.g., between 5:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m.) effectively reduces body weight and fat mass—by approximately 1.4 kg and 0.7 kg over 11 days, respectively—while preserving lean mass and boosting fat oxidation during exercise, indicative of superior metabolic adaptability. This protocol maintained eucaloric intake yet lowered plasma glucose in the latter half of the day without altering overall insulin or energy expenditure profiles. Proponents attribute these benefits to parasympathetic nervous system dominance in the late afternoon and evening, fostering a “rest and digest” state that enhances nutrient absorption and gut motility when cortisol levels are naturally lower. Morning eating, conversely, may coincide with sympathetic activation and elevated cortisol, potentially slowing gastric emptying, reducing intestinal blood flow, and disrupting microbiota balance, thereby impairing digestion. Popular health experts echo this, advising OMAD in the late afternoon or early evening to align with hormonal shifts and avoid bedtime proximity (at least 2 hours) for better sleep quality.
Broader metabolic health implications of OMAD and meal timing extend beyond insulin dynamics. Intermittent fasting variants, including time-restricted eating, promote ketone metabolism during prolonged fasts, offering neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects. A meta-analysis of fasting protocols underscores that alternate-day fasting (ADF) yields robust improvements in metabolic parameters, though all forms—early or late—demonstrate potential. Physical activity timing complements this; afternoon or evening exercise appears more beneficial for obesity and diabetes management than morning sessions. Chronotype plays a pivotal role: morning-oriented individuals (larks) may thrive on early OMAD, exhibiting superior vascular insulin sensitivity, while evening types (owls) risk poorer outcomes with misaligned schedules. Skipping breakfast, often inherent in later windows, correlates with a 21% heightened diabetes risk, compounded by late dinners leading to elevated HbA1c. For diabetics, tailored strategies—such as dividing dinners or protein preloads—can mitigate excursions, with low-glycemic index foods preferred morning-side.
In practice, the chart’s windows offer a structured, evidence-informed starting point for leveraging morning sensitivity, but flexibility is essential. Factors like lifestyle, social commitments, and health conditions necessitate experimentation; most OMAD adherents opt for dinner for convenience, though earlier slots may maximize circadian alignment for weight loss and glucose control. Risks of OMAD include nutrient shortfalls, especially if meals lack density in vitamins, minerals, and fiber, alongside potential for binge tendencies or disordered eating. Hydration, electrolyte balance, and gradual adaptation (e.g., starting with 16:8 fasting) are crucial. Ultimately, while the chart’s framework is supported by circadian research favoring early intake, conflicting evidence on evening benefits suggests a balanced view: optimal timing is individualized, prioritizing sustainability and professional guidance to harness metabolic advantages without compromise.
| Aspect | Morning/Early OMAD (Chart-Aligned) | Evening/Late OMAD |
|---|---|---|
| Insulin Sensitivity Alignment | High; leverages peak for efficient glucose handling | Lower; may increase postprandial responses but tolerable in some |
| Metabolic Benefits | Improved glucose tolerance, reduced hyperglycemia, better for weight management per chrononutrition | Enhanced fat oxidation, metabolic flexibility during exercise, weight/fat loss in studies |
| Hormonal Factors | Potential interference from high cortisol; sympathetic dominance | Parasympathetic aid for digestion; lower cortisol |
| Glucose Control | Favorable excursions; lower HbA1c risk | Reduced daytime glucose but higher evening spikes possible |
| Practicality | Suits early risers; energy for day | Socially convenient; avoids morning rush |
| Risks | Afternoon energy dips, hunger | Proximity to bedtime disrupts sleep; higher cardiometabolic risk if too late |
| Supporting Evidence | Chrononutrition reviews, early TRE trials | Evening OMAD crossover studies, parasympathetic-focused advice |
Key Citations
- Human adipose tissue expresses intrinsic circadian rhythm in insulin sensitivity
- Endogenous circadian system and circadian misalignment impact glucose tolerance via separate mechanisms in humans
- Differential Effects of One Meal per Day in the Evening on Metabolic Health and Physical Performance in Lean Individuals
- Chrononutrition in the management of diabetes
- Study Finds That Eating Meals Earlier Improves Metabolic Health
- Intermittent fasting and health: Does timing matter?
- Chrononutrition: Timing of meals matters for your health
- Perspective: Time-Restricted Eating—Integrating the What with the When
Source
Easy Dunbar’s Number Science
Just DO Proverbs 22:10 and FIND OUT …
Cast out the scorner, and contention shall go away; yea, strife and reproach shall cease.
Cast out the scoffer, and contention will go out; Yea, strife and ignominy will cease.
Drive out the scoffer, and contention will go away; Even strife and dishonor will cease.
Drive out the scoffer, and contention will go out; yes, strife and abuse will cease.
Cast out the scorner, and contention shall go out; yea, strife and reproach shall cease.
Drive out a mocker, and conflict goes too; then quarreling and dishonor will cease.
Drive out a mocker, and conflict goes too; then quarrelling and dishonour will cease.
Remove the mocker and conflict disappears; judgment and shame also stop.
Throw the scoffer out, and quarreling goes too; strife and insults cease.
Arguments and fights will come to an end, if you chase away those who insult others.
Cast out the scorner, and contention will depart, and strife and ignominy shall cease.
Cast out the scoffer, and contention shall go out with him, and quarrels and reproaches shall cease.
Get rid of the proud who laugh at what is right, and trouble will leave with them. All arguments and insults will end.
If someone laughs at what is right, send him away. Then there will be no more arguments, quarrels and insults.
Drive away a scoffer, and conflict leaves. Quarrels and insults cease.
Drive out a scoffer, and strife will go out, and quarreling and abuse will cease.
Drive out a scoffer, and strife will go out, and quarrelling and abuse will cease.
·Get rid of [Banish; Drive out] the ·one who makes fun of wisdom [mocker]. Then ·fighting [conflict], ·quarrels [judgments], and ·insults [shame] will stop.
Cast out the scorner, and strife shall go out: so contention and reproach shall cease.
Drive out a mocker, and conflict will leave. Quarreling and abuse will stop.
Get rid of a conceited person, and then there will be no more arguments, quarreling, or name-calling.
Drive out a mocker, and conflict goes too; then quarreling and dishonor will cease.
Get rid of the person who makes fun of wisdom. Then fighting, quarrels and insults will stop.
Throw out the mocker and strife departs, too; furthermore, quarrels and discord will end.
¶ Cast out the scorner, and contention shall go out; strife and reproach shall cease.
Cast out the scorner, and contention shall go out; yea, strife and reproach shall cease.
Cast out the scorner, and contention shall go out; yea, strife and reproach shall cease.
Drive out the scoffer, and strife will go out, Even contention and disgrace will cease.
Drive out a scoffer and strife will go out; quarrel and abuse will cease.
Throw out the mocker, and you will be rid of tension, fighting, and quarrels.
Kick out the troublemakers and things will quiet down; you need a break from bickering and griping!
Cast out the scorner, and contention will go out; yes, strife and reproach will cease.
Drive out a mocker, and conflict will leave. Quarreling and abuse will stop.
Expel the arrogant and discord goes too; strife and insult cease.
Drive out the scoffer, and strife will leave, Even quarreling and dishonor will cease.
Drive out the scoffer, and contention will go out, Even strife and dishonor will cease.
Banish the scoffer and strife will cease; discord and abuse will come to an end.
Get rid of the one who makes fun of wisdom. Then fighting, quarrels, and insults will stop.
Drive out the scorner and contention will leave; strife and insults will cease.
If you drive away those who make fun of others, fighting also goes away. Arguing and unkind words will stop.
Drive out the mocker, and out goes strife; quarrels and insults are ended.
Drive out the mocker, and out goes strife; quarrels and insults are ended.
Cast out the scoffer, and contention will leave; Yes, strife and reproach will cease.
Send away the man who laughs at the truth, and arguing, fighting and shame will stop.
Throw out the mocker, and fighting goes, too. Quarrels and insults will disappear.
Drive out a scoffer, and strife goes out; quarrelling and abuse will cease.
Drive out a scoffer, and strife goes out; quarrelling and abuse will cease.
Drive out a scoffer, and strife goes out; quarreling and abuse will cease.
Drive out a scoffer, and strife goes out; quarreling and abuse will cease.
Cast out the scoffer, and contention shall leave; indeed, strife and kalon (shame) shall cease.
Cast out the scoffer, and strife shall go out. Indeed, contention and dishonor shall cease.
Drive out a scoffer, and strife will go out, and quarreling and abuse will cease.
Drive out a scoffer, and strife will go out, and quarreling and abuse will cease.
Throw out a scoffer and strife will go out, quarreling and disgrace will cease.
Expel a mocker, and watch the wrangling go with him; rivalry and rude remarks will also stop.
Drive out the mocker, and strife will go out; yes, quarrels and insults will stop.
Cast thou out a scorner, and strife shall go out with him; and causes and despisings shall cease.
Cast out a scorner — and contention goeth out, And strife and shame cease.
Footnotes
-
If you’re late to the movie and unclear about the PRECISE DEFINITION of the capital ‘T’ word in this context, ask someone trustworthy. If you can find even one. The tri-partite defintion is not the Triple Equivalence, and not even close to what you thought … because you heard somewhere. It was published months and years ago, refined and refined over time as new data AUTHENTICATION, VALIDATION, and VERIFICATION completes its vetting processes.Seems like you probably heard the bait RIGHT, which was intended to cause you to think … WRONG. ↩